• The Student Lens

Should Northern Ireland raise the age of criminal responsibility?

Updated: Aug 28


As the UN committee on the Rights of a Child have come to the conclusion that the minimum Age of Criminal Responsibility (ACR) should be 12 or above, it would seem that England, Wales and Northern Ireland’s ACR of a mere 10 is not aligning with an important international convention and is one of the lowest in Europe. Added to this, scientific research has shown that the brain of a 10 year old child is developmentally immature, and hasn’t evolved through adolescence yet, meaning that the child may make more irrational decisions than they would at the age of 18. A child of 10 is therefore less likely to be able to decipher between right and wrong and a survey taken of over 5000 children in Northern Ireland backed this up as only 49% believed that a 10 year old would understand if they had broken the law. In the same survey less than ¼ of the children recognised punching someone to be a crime indicating that if a child becomes involved with the Criminal Justice System at a young age, long-lasting resentment towards it may follow due to lack of understanding surrounding their punishment. This may mean that in the future police will be unable to have conversations to check how certain communities are doing, due to a bad relationship with them or even have as good a handle on controlling crime in an area. Besides, keeping children outside of the Criminal Justice System can mean alternative methods of handling child crime take place such as the use of welfare laws to restrict liberty meaning accountability for actions is still there.


On the other hand, a Review of the Youth Justice System in Northern Ireland found that within the current system where the ACR is 10, certain practices work efficiently for the benefit of young people. It noted that the quality of the custody facilities at Woodlands Juvenile Justice Centre is high so perhaps a young person’s experience there instils core values in them, allowing them to realise the consequences of crime at a younger age, which they are then able to consider as an adult. Moreover, the fact that only a small amount of young people are admitted to the centre would suggest that young people are not being implemented in the Criminal Justice System in unnecessarily large numbers. The review also praised the introduction of youth conferencing which allows young people to account for their behaviour to victims themselves making it necessary for young people to think about repercussions as a result of crime.



CLAIRE DICKSON

Sixth form student at Banbridge Academy in County Down, Northern Ireland. Interests in current affairs and playing the piano and viola.

14 views

Join our mailing list

  • Instagram
  • White Facebook Icon